<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Eternity in an Hour</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jamesesz.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jamesesz.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>To See a World in a Grain of Sand</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 13:43:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Flight by jamesesz</title>
		<link>http://jamesesz.wordpress.com/2009/11/06/flight/#comment-600</link>
		<dc:creator>jamesesz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 13:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesesz.wordpress.com/?p=2027#comment-600</guid>
		<description>Thanks! =)Btw..ur photo is lovely!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks! =)Btw..ur photo is lovely!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Flight by lizii</title>
		<link>http://jamesesz.wordpress.com/2009/11/06/flight/#comment-599</link>
		<dc:creator>lizii</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 10:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesesz.wordpress.com/?p=2027#comment-599</guid>
		<description>good style =) i like the couplet at the end</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good style =) i like the couplet at the end</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Third Proposition, Logos &#8211; The Building Blocks of Philosophy by jamesesz</title>
		<link>http://jamesesz.wordpress.com/2009/10/31/language-the-building-blocks-of-philosophy/#comment-598</link>
		<dc:creator>jamesesz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 13:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesesz.wordpress.com/?p=1983#comment-598</guid>
		<description>Words and languages are the crude form of thought..Concepts and ideas are only represented imperfectly through words..However, this remains the only way we can successfully communicate them..Maybe one day we can read each others&#039; mind and words won&#039;t be necessary..

I for one do not look forward for that day..LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Words and languages are the crude form of thought..Concepts and ideas are only represented imperfectly through words..However, this remains the only way we can successfully communicate them..Maybe one day we can read each others&#8217; mind and words won&#8217;t be necessary..</p>
<p>I for one do not look forward for that day..LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Third Proposition, Logos &#8211; The Building Blocks of Philosophy by lizii</title>
		<link>http://jamesesz.wordpress.com/2009/10/31/language-the-building-blocks-of-philosophy/#comment-597</link>
		<dc:creator>lizii</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 13:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesesz.wordpress.com/?p=1983#comment-597</guid>
		<description>agree with much, of course. obviously words are crucial to the expression of philosophy, but what of thought? what of a different type of thought; the type that creates such wonderful philosophy as those at which we marvel? those who have created these thoughts are indeed extremely clever, for they have spelled out truths which we only recognise so fully after we see them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>agree with much, of course. obviously words are crucial to the expression of philosophy, but what of thought? what of a different type of thought; the type that creates such wonderful philosophy as those at which we marvel? those who have created these thoughts are indeed extremely clever, for they have spelled out truths which we only recognise so fully after we see them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 01. About Me by pochp</title>
		<link>http://jamesesz.wordpress.com/my-profile/#comment-596</link>
		<dc:creator>pochp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-596</guid>
		<description>Just I as suspected.
That&#039;s what&#039;s happening to me too so I know :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just I as suspected.<br />
That&#8217;s what&#8217;s happening to me too so I know :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 01. About Me by jamesesz</title>
		<link>http://jamesesz.wordpress.com/my-profile/#comment-595</link>
		<dc:creator>jamesesz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-595</guid>
		<description>Business! LOL, forced to like it..Through necessity</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Business! LOL, forced to like it..Through necessity</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Proton Problem &#8211; Protectionism does not Protect by jamesesz</title>
		<link>http://jamesesz.wordpress.com/2008/04/17/the-proton-problem-protectionism-do-not-protect/#comment-594</link>
		<dc:creator>jamesesz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 06:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesesz.wordpress.com/?p=126#comment-594</guid>
		<description>The Volkswagen was better..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Volkswagen was better..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Corporate Treasury: Foreign Exchange and Interest Rate Risk Report for BG Group by What Are Some Anti Cellulite Treatment Options ? &#124; Anti-Aging Guide</title>
		<link>http://jamesesz.wordpress.com/2009/10/30/corporate-treasury-foreign-exchange-and-interest-rate-risk-report-for-bg-group/#comment-593</link>
		<dc:creator>What Are Some Anti Cellulite Treatment Options ? &#124; Anti-Aging Guide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 21:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesesz.wordpress.com/?p=1967#comment-593</guid>
		<description>[...] Corporate Treasury: Foreign Exchange and Interest Rate Risk Report &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Corporate Treasury: Foreign Exchange and Interest Rate Risk Report &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The First Proposition, Philosophos &#8211; The Inescapable Philosophy of Philosophy by Approaching Systematic Philosophy: The Start of the Beginning &#171; Eternity in an Hour</title>
		<link>http://jamesesz.wordpress.com/2009/10/28/the-inescapable-philosophy-of-philosophy/#comment-592</link>
		<dc:creator>Approaching Systematic Philosophy: The Start of the Beginning &#171; Eternity in an Hour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesesz.wordpress.com/?p=1947#comment-592</guid>
		<description>[...] of High Oil Prices on the Malaysian EconomyMarketing Assignment: A Marketing Plan for HSBC (7Ps)The Inescapable Philosophy of PhilosophyThe Time Value of Money Controversy in Islamic BankingHow Big is the Solar System?Corporate [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of High Oil Prices on the Malaysian EconomyMarketing Assignment: A Marketing Plan for HSBC (7Ps)The Inescapable Philosophy of PhilosophyThe Time Value of Money Controversy in Islamic BankingHow Big is the Solar System?Corporate [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Time Value of Money Controversy in Islamic Banking by jamesesz</title>
		<link>http://jamesesz.wordpress.com/2008/05/15/the-time-value-of-money-controversy-in-islamic-banking/#comment-591</link>
		<dc:creator>jamesesz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 11:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesesz.wordpress.com/?p=158#comment-591</guid>
		<description>You got that right!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You got that right!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Corporate Treasury: Foreign Exchange and Interest Rate Risk Report for BG Group by Interest Rates &#187; Corporate Treasury: Foreign Exchange and Interest Rate Risk Report &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://jamesesz.wordpress.com/2009/10/30/corporate-treasury-foreign-exchange-and-interest-rate-risk-report-for-bg-group/#comment-590</link>
		<dc:creator>Interest Rates &#187; Corporate Treasury: Foreign Exchange and Interest Rate Risk Report &#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 05:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesesz.wordpress.com/?p=1967#comment-590</guid>
		<description>[...] Read the rest of this great post here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read the rest of this great post here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Corporate Treasury: Foreign Exchange and Interest Rate Risk Report for BG Group by The Most Downloaded Ebooks and Audiobooks From the Library For &#8230; &#171; Wilson&#39;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://jamesesz.wordpress.com/2009/10/30/corporate-treasury-foreign-exchange-and-interest-rate-risk-report-for-bg-group/#comment-589</link>
		<dc:creator>The Most Downloaded Ebooks and Audiobooks From the Library For &#8230; &#171; Wilson&#39;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 04:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesesz.wordpress.com/?p=1967#comment-589</guid>
		<description>[...] Corporate Treasury: Foreign Exchange and Interest Rate Risk Report &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Corporate Treasury: Foreign Exchange and Interest Rate Risk Report &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The First Proposition, Philosophos &#8211; The Inescapable Philosophy of Philosophy by jamesesz</title>
		<link>http://jamesesz.wordpress.com/2009/10/28/the-inescapable-philosophy-of-philosophy/#comment-588</link>
		<dc:creator>jamesesz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 16:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesesz.wordpress.com/?p=1947#comment-588</guid>
		<description>Thanks Poch! Do tell me if you have any different opinions on the matter..Or anything I omitted! Lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Poch! Do tell me if you have any different opinions on the matter..Or anything I omitted! Lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The First Proposition, Philosophos &#8211; The Inescapable Philosophy of Philosophy by pochp</title>
		<link>http://jamesesz.wordpress.com/2009/10/28/the-inescapable-philosophy-of-philosophy/#comment-587</link>
		<dc:creator>pochp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 11:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesesz.wordpress.com/?p=1947#comment-587</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s reposted now dear James.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s reposted now dear James.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The First Proposition, Philosophos &#8211; The Inescapable Philosophy of Philosophy by pochp</title>
		<link>http://jamesesz.wordpress.com/2009/10/28/the-inescapable-philosophy-of-philosophy/#comment-586</link>
		<dc:creator>pochp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 11:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesesz.wordpress.com/?p=1947#comment-586</guid>
		<description>EXCELLENT!
You&#039;ve just elucidated and clarified things and words
I&#039;ve been wanting to express.
It&#039;s just sad that most academic philosophers are snobs.
And I simply classify philosophers in two:
the academic and the folk(sy). Now I&#039;m not condemning academic philosophy (which I study too), but most of those who practice it. 
Your essay will be reposted at WP Writers Group later tonight.
I&#039;ll be proud of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EXCELLENT!<br />
You&#8217;ve just elucidated and clarified things and words<br />
I&#8217;ve been wanting to express.<br />
It&#8217;s just sad that most academic philosophers are snobs.<br />
And I simply classify philosophers in two:<br />
the academic and the folk(sy). Now I&#8217;m not condemning academic philosophy (which I study too), but most of those who practice it.<br />
Your essay will be reposted at WP Writers Group later tonight.<br />
I&#8217;ll be proud of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
